Bond Market, Gold, Yield Curve and the Changes to Come

While it is far from the only important indicator for the markets, the 10-2 Year Treasury Yield Spread is very important because it takes what is probably the most important market for macro signaling (the bond market) and gives us a view into the dynamics between short and long-term yields. In the bond market, duration means a lot.

For one example, long-term bonds are much more vulnerable to inflation’s negative effects than short-term bonds. Short-term bonds also act as a liquidity haven during deflationary market crises. Long-term bonds can work quite well during disinflationary times and pay out better income than short-term bonds, but in a full out deflation scare when the very system (and its exponential debt load) comes into question insofar as you want bonds, you want short-term (in my experience 1-3 year Treasury, T-bills and Treasury Money Market). In other words, relative safety.

From an American perspective, as long as the government says that stuff is safe it is safe. As long as the government is intact and functioning, that is. But it is only safe because of the fact that the governing body of a society long past its shelf life of sound monetary management says so. Otherwise, it’s a government operating under the dual pressure of unpayable debt (short of attempting to inflate it away) and waning confidence – with the first overt sign of revolution occurring on January 6, 2021.

So, short-term Treasury bonds are safe. But short-term Treasury bonds are not really safe, are they? They sure are not gold in that regard. Unlike the trillions in debt attached to the US and many global bond and currency markets, gold has no such liability as it pays no income and is just an old rock that ancient societies used as money. It had stability in its finite quantities and the fact that it was no one else’s debt. Today it is just an anchor within the storm of modern finance and in a storm you probably want your boat to be well anchored lest it be tossed to and fro and cast upon the rocks as wreckage.

But the bond market is absolute gold as a macro signaler. Look no further than the Continuum chart we have used over the last 15 years to identifying the correct macro backdrop at any given time. Since the 1980s, and until 2022, that backdrop was signaled to be disinflationary by definition of the gentle, robotic trend downward in long-term yields.

• While the entire history is not shown on this chart, the downtrend goes back to the 1980s, coming off the Volcker panic-hike regime of the 1970s after inflation got well out of control.
• Downtrending bond yields (uptrending bonds) signaled ‘nope, no inflation problems here’ (reality might have had a different opinion, but we are talking about the signaling of a heavily manipulated market) and this was implied license for big brained Fed chair people and little brained politicians alike to create policy to inflate the system at all points of stress, let alone crisis.
• For many years we used the now-green moving averages (which can now be viewed as support for the new macro) as resistance to changing the macro. Those MA lines used to be red as were the arrows. They were the backbone of the long-term disinflationary trend. In 2022, something broke and in my opinion, it was a profound move that we are tasked with interpreting correctly, now and in the coming years. The decades long disinflationary trend by which inflating policymakers were given license, is over.
• In my opinion, if they try their old tricks on bond yield pullbacks (e.g. the big pullback we’ve seen over the last few months or even all the way back to the moving averages) the efficacy is not going to be the magical and heroic kicks saves of the past.
• The implication of the bond market rebellion of 2022 is ‘Enough!’ In my opinion a saturation point was hit and the bond market could not sop up anymore of the chicanery (i.e. inflationary bubble making by policy).
• The inflationary signaling of the broken Continuum does not mean inflation as far as the eye can see, however. It may mean that new deflationary episodes met with dovish policy response will no longer work as effectively as it did over previous decades. Again, the bond market says the system became choked with inflation manufactured from debt.
• At best, new inflationary phases may be more corrosive for more aspects of the economy and/or benefit a different set of assets, like precious metals and commodities critical to social progress (thinking Uranium, Copper, Rare Earths, Lithium, etc.). There is always a need for food/Ags as well. Ah, yes there is.
• Now that long-term yields have shown their hand I would no longer bet on real estate as a good long-term investment. RE was stellar during the Continuum’s intact phase. In the future? There could be quick bursts of optimism on yield declines, but if the new macro holds we may not see sub-3% again in some of our lifetimes. This could grind at real estate over time.
• However, a new macro may cast its net globally to emerging and frontier markets, many of which are rich in natural resources, including precious metals and commodities. In essence, we might also speculate about the possibility that the world (everything bubble) is not ending but instead, is shifting… away from the over-financialized western complex that has benefited from remote monetary management (bond market manipulation), to markets that have lagged during the era of financialization. We’ll look at a few charts of EM, Asia and the Frontiers in the report below.

Get The App

Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.

Download Now

I realize that just above I sound like the BRICS-promoting/De-Dollarizing people I sometimes criticize. But the criticism is only for the ‘perma’ nature of those views. There is a thing called timing and another thing called activation. On a big picture, measured over years, the shift in the macro may shake out per the above and become activated.