Buy the fact

Yes, the Fed only hiked rates by 0.25% – not 0.5% as once feared. But it has also penciled in a further 1.5% in rate hikes this year, and 0.75-1% next year – taking the Fed funds rate from 0% only a week ago to just under 3% by end-2023. This is in line with what the market had already priced in, but less than most thought the Fed would admit to at last week’s meeting. After an initial sell-off on the news, however, equities rebounded on relief that Fed chair did not see a high risk of recession anytime soon (though what else could he say!). Nonetheless, bond yields moved higher even as oil prices and the $US eased.

Another equity positive last week was China’s tech pivot, with news reports suggesting officials will try to be somewhat more supportive of the sector – and less draconian in terms of regulation. That helped give Chinese stocks, and technology stocks especially, a lift. Markets also hoped that Russia and Ukraine could strike a peace deal sometime soon, with some easing back in oil prices.

Ultimately, however, equity investors seem to be hoping that either aggressive Fed rate hikes won’t drive the economy into recession, or the Fed will likely pivot if any material risk of a recession emerges. To my mind, this is asking the wrong question. The real question is how much economic slowing will be required to tame inflation – as only this will determine how aggressive the Fed needs to be. If the Fed is truly concerned about inflation (as it should be), it will likely slow growth materially – even risking recession – if inflation (notably wage inflation) remains uncomfortably high. My concern is that that even if supply-chain bottleneck pressures ease somewhat soon, the U.S. labour market will still be left red hot with overly strong wage growth. There’s only one way that problem can be solved – a material growth slowdown brought on by higher rates – both of which could pressure corporate earnings and equity valuations. As a result, I suspect the U.S. equity market correction is not over – and the ultimate decline could be at least 20%, even without a recession.

Get The App

Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.

Download Now

Indeed, my call of U.S. 10-year bond yields reaching 2.25% in H1’22 is almost achieved, and I am now targeting a rise in this key financial indicator to 3% by end-March 2023. Assuming we’re not in WW3 by then, my base case is that the Fed will raise rates by 0.5% at the upcoming May meeting.

In terms of the week ahead, there will be lots of Fed speakers giving their opinions on the outlook for the economy and interest rates – I suspect most will err on the side of being hawkish. Also of note will be the U.S. manufacturing and service sector PMI surveys, with interest in the degree of ongoing cost pressures and supply disruption.

The key local development last week was the very strong February labour market report, with a 77k gain in employment and a drop in the unemployment rate to a 13 year low of 4.0%. This is supportive of the RBA hiking rates in coming months, but it’s still less than clear whether such apparent labour market tightness will lead to much wage growth (indeed, causality could even be reversed – maybe it is surprisingly active job seekers and benign wage growth that is allowing so many jobs to be created?).

The other notable development is the ongoing strength in commodity prices, which has helped the $A and local resource stocks outperform in recent weeks. Surprisingly strong iron-ore prices will give the Morrison Government even more money to spend in next week’s pre-election budget.

There’s little on the local data front this week, with RBA Governor Lowe giving a speech to business journalists tomorrow – which is unlikely to be too policy specific.