Still Too Early To Give Up On Trump's Tax Reform Agenda

 | Jul 21, 2017 14:52

Originally published by AMP Capital h2 Investment markets and key developments over the past week/h2

  • Share markets were mixed over the last week with gains in the US helped by good earnings news, Europe and China but Japanese shares flat and Australian shares down a bit partly on the back of perceptions that the RBA has become more hawkish. Bond yields mostly fell. Commodity prices generally rose helped by further falls in the US dollar. This along with perceptions of a more hawkish RBA helped push the Australian dollar above $US0.79 before comments by RBA Deputy Governor Guy Debelle indicating that no significance should be attached to the RBA’s recent reference to the neutral rate of interest helped push it back down again.
  • It's still too early to write off Trump's tax reform agenda. The failure of US Senate Republicans to agree on either a "repeal and replace" or "repeal and delay" of Obamacare obviously adds to uncertainty around whether Republicans in Congress can agree amongst themselves on a budget, government funding to avoid a shutdown in September, an increase in the debt ceiling which is necessary by early October and most importantly on tax reform. Of course health care reform could make yet another comeback, but uncertainty around all of these could cause bouts of angst in investment markets in the next few months. However, as we saw in 2013 it’s in neither of the major party's interest to allow a US government shutdown and neither party wants a debt default. More importantly though while the risks around tax reform have increased, Republicans are in general agreement on wanting lower taxes, they need a win prior to next year's mid-term elections and after the mid-terms it’s unlikely they will be able to cut taxes because the Democrats are likely to have won control of at least the House of Representatives. So we still lean towards some sort of tax reform getting up. Interestingly though financial markets appear to have largely given up on it, but it hasn't stopped the US share market pushing new record highs.
  • Noise around a US trade war with Mexico and China is likely to pick up with the renegotiation of NAFTA coming up and signs of some deterioration in relations between the US and China and little progress in their Comprehensive Economic Dialogue. Time will tell but the US' objectives for the NAFTA renegotiation suggest limited changes, US-China trade talks are continuing and we remain confident that despite lots of noise and partial moves (eg, US tariffs on steel imports) that cool heads will ultimately prevail.
  • Not another attempt to come the raw prawn with us on Australian interest rates! The financial market reaction to the minutes from the last RBA meeting was way over the top. Don't read too much into them. I must admit to finding the periodic discordance between the post meeting statement and the minutes a bit disturbing - surely they relate to the same meeting and so should leave the same impression. It does make me wonder though whether the high level of RBA communications could just be adding to noise and confusion around interest rates at times. Mind you, this is a much bigger problem in the US.
  • But back to where interest rates are headed...the minutes certainty did sound a bit more upbeat than the initial post meeting statement about growth and wages. But the bit that caused most excitement was the reference to a 3.5% neutral rate of interest, ie the rate of interest consistent with growth at potential, inflation at target and which neither causes the economy to accelerate or decelerate. Some have interpreted this as indicating that a series of eight quarterly rate hikes of 0.25% are imminent. This is very doubtful.
  • First, the neutral rate discussion looks to have been just a regular “deep dive” into a key issue and so as Deputy Governor Guy Debelle pointed out “no particular significance should be read into the fact the neutral rate was discussed” at the last meeting.
  • Second, the neutral rate is a rubbery rather academic concept, a bit like the non-inflation accelerating rate of unemployment (NAIRU) and the “output gap”. In theory it should be around long run potential nominal growth, but it can move around a lot given attitudes to debt and debt levels, the gap between the rates bank lend at and the official cash rate, inflation expectations, uncertainty about what potential growth is, etc. At the Fed, they refer to a long term neutral rate (seen to be around 3% at present) and a short term neutral rate with Fed Chair Yellen recently saying it was already close to neutral with the Fed Funds rate at just 1-1.25%! So while a comparison to some neutral rate may be of use in assessing whether policy is easy or tight it’s not a firm target that central banks head for.
  • Third, for what it’s worth our assessment is that because of higher household debt to income levels and higher bank lending rate spreads the neutral rate is around 2.75%.
Get The App
Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.
Download Now

  • Fourth, a rise in the cash rate to 3.5% over the next two years if passed on in full would push the ratio of household interest payments to household disposable income from 8.6% currently to around 12%. This would be well above the average ratio of 9.6% since 2000, above the 2011 peak of 11.4% and towards the pre GFC peak of 13.2%, both of which saw hits to consumer spending – see the next chart. The hit this time would likely be greater as unlike a decade ago households lack the optimism to take on more debt to cover higher interest payments (remember the ATM in the lounge room!). So the 3.5% of income hit to spending power would likely take a big chunk out of consumer spending. Of course these numbers are averages - for those households with a mortgage the interest payment to income ratio would be around three times higher and in Sydney and Melbourne it would be even higher again. Which all suggests that in the absence of much stronger economic conditions rates won’t be increased by 2%.