Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

The Risk If Central Banks Get Trigger-Happy in 2018: Daniel Moss

Published 07/12/2017, 09:00 pm
Updated 08/12/2017, 02:09 am
© Bloomberg. UNITED STATES - JUNE 24:  The U.S. Federal Reserve Building stands in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, June 24, 2009. Federal Reserve officials will probably seek today to reassure investors they can keep short-term interest rates at a record low without igniting inflation.  (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

(Bloomberg View) -- One big economic risk next year is that things go right.

Wait, what?

The danger is that 2017's synchronized global expansion continues into 2018, and that central banks respond imprudently.

One dominant theme as this year draws to a close is how monetary policy in most of the major economies has oriented in the same direction -- toward phasing out the stimulus that has underpinned asset prices and much else.

Among the Group of Seven, is anyone seriously predicting an increase in stimulus? No. Will monetary policy remain easy and accommodative? Mostly, but less so.

The problem would arise if monetary chieftains decide they have to do more than they indicated they would. In the past week, Deutsche Bank AG (DE:DBKGn) nudged up its forecast for the Federal Reserve, tipping four interest-rate increases in 2018, rather than the three that the Fed itself has flagged. Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS). and JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM). were already there.

Isn't that a sign of strength and resilience? Yes, but investors have become so spoon-fed on forward guidance that they lose the ability to sometimes think for themselves. (Witness a little spat in Canada.) If the Fed gets more aggressive than it has signaled, and economists feel they have to keep upgrading -- rather than downgrading -- investors may start questioning some assumptions.

Let's look at the U.S. All the focus on disappointments -- with gross domestic product clocking a bit more than 2 percent growth year after year -- tend to obscure one constant: The unemployment rate relentlessly grinds lower. Fed officials have pretty consistently underestimated how low the unemployment rate would go.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

What if the jobless rate heads toward 3.5 percent next year? Does inflation then begin firing? If it doesn't, do Fed officials hold to their faith that inflation and wages will likely start behaving when the jobless rate dips even lower?

Lest we think an inflation uptick -- "breakout" seems a tad dramatic -- would be just a U.S. issue, let's take a look at the world's other big economic engine. China's producer prices began rising late last year and have been one of the great untold stories in the global reflation. (The West's reflation may very well not have been about Donald Trump at all.)

Prior to that, factory prices had declined for four years. That little boomlet in Chinese PPI was supposed to have dissipated quickly. It hasn't. Prices rose 6.9 percent in October from a year ago, beating consensus of 6.6 percent. Is that flowing through into consumer prices?

The case is ambiguous; CPI was up 1.9 percent from a year earlier. Still modest, but a touch higher than many economists had estimated. This isn't spectacular stuff. Still, it was dismissed as a short-term boost that would run out of puff. It hasn't.

Continuing global growth need not be catastrophic. And higher interest rates are hardly the number one cause for worry. But it's worth considering that in 2018, central banks may see a case for higher rates that they did not forecast back in 2017.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Daniel Moss writes and edits articles on economics for Bloomberg View. Previously he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for global economics, and has led teams in Asia, Europe and North America.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.